An English Garner: Ingatherings from Our History and Literature (8 of 8)
Edition facts
Edward Arber's eighth and final volume of An English Garner (1897) assembles thirty-eight texts from the fifteenth to early seventeenth centuries, ranging from John Lydgate's verse on Agincourt to Michael Drayton's odes. The collection's title page motto—from Raleigh and Milton—signals a dual interest in historical record and literary craft. The excerpts reveal distinct authorial choices: Gascoigne's The Spoil of Antwerp employs a plain, almost documentary prose to describe the 1576 sack, while the sonnet sequences by R. Tofte and others lean heavily on Petrarchan conventions, with repeated images of blood, tears, and disdainful mistresses. The prose narratives, such as the account of Campion's capture, favor directness and circumstantial detail over rhetorical flourish.
Diction in the Sonnets: Petrarchan Borrowings and Variations
The sonnets in this volume, attributed to R. Tofte and others, consistently employ Petrarchan diction: the lover bleeds, weeps, and worships a cruel mistress. In poem XV, the speaker calls himself a 'gentle tame deer' hunted by his lady, a conceit traceable to Petrarch's Rime sparse. The vocabulary clusters around 'disdain,' 'cruel,' 'blood,' and 'fire,' creating a lexicon of suffering. Yet variations appear: poem XIII instructs a painter to 'draw Disdain' by painting the lady's face, a meta-poetic twist. Poem XVII inverts the mirror trope, urging Laura to see her reflection in the speaker's tear-filled eyes. These choices show authors working within a shared tradition while seeking small innovations.
Voice in Historical Prose: Gascoigne's Eyewitness Account
George Gascoigne's The Spoil of Antwerp adopts a first-person plural perspective—'we saw,' 'we heard'—that lends immediacy. The prose is paratactic, with short clauses: 'They brake open chests, they spoiled goods, they slew men.' Gascoigne avoids classical allusions or moralizing, instead cataloging atrocities with a reporter's restraint. This contrasts with John Proctor's History of Sir Thomas Wyat's Rebellion, which uses third-person narration and includes speeches attributed to historical figures. Gascoigne's choice to write as a witness, not a historian, shapes the text's authority and emotional effect.
Structure in the Sonnet Sequences: Framing Devices and Thematic Clusters
The sonnet sequences are organized around recurring motifs: the lady's cruelty, the lover's suffering, and the paradox of love. Poem XI uses the Narcissus myth as an analogy for self-hatred, while poem XVI plays on the alpha and omega of the lady's hair. The sequences often open with a declaration of love and close with a plea or resignation. The poems are numbered but lack narrative progression; instead, they circle the same emotional states. This structural choice—repetition with variation—reflects the Petrarchan mode, where invention lies in the handling of conventional topoi rather than in plot.
Description in the Prose Narratives: Circumstantial Detail and Plain Style
The prose accounts, such as the True Report of the burning of the Steeple and Church of Paul's, rely on precise circumstantial detail: 'the fire began about four of the clock in the afternoon,' 'the lead melted and ran down.' The description is functional, not decorative. In the account of Campion's capture, the writer notes the exact location—'at Lyford in Berkshire'—and the method of concealment. This plain style contrasts with the sonnets' ornate imagery. Arber's selection thus juxtaposes two descriptive modes: one aiming at verisimilitude through fact, the other through metaphor.
Readers approaching this volume should attend to the variety of authorial strategies on display. The sonnets reward attention to diction and conceit, while the prose pieces reveal how early modern writers shaped historical events through narrative voice and descriptive choice. Comparing Gascoigne's eyewitness style with Proctor's chronicle mode illuminates the range of available rhetorical options. The collection offers a cross-section of late Tudor and early Stuart literary practices, inviting analysis of how authors adapted classical and continental models to English subjects.